Skip to content

Anglo-Saxons

Tagsconspiracyothering

EquivalentsRUанглосаксы


“Anglo-Saxons” (Russian: anglosaksy) is a conspiratorial shorthand — especially common on Russian state television and in official statements — for the United States and the United Kingdom, sometimes the wider English-speaking world, portrayed as the scheming puppet-masters who secretly direct world events against Russia. Where the Collective West frame names a faceless bloc, “Anglo-Saxons” gives that bloc a hidden inner core: a small, racially and culturally defined cabal said to control the rest.

The term is not an ethnographic description but an accusation. It implies that behind every adverse event — sanctions, sabotage, “colour revolutions,” the war in Ukraine itself — stands a single, ancient, malevolent Anglo-American will.

“Anglo-Saxon” as a geopolitical category has a long pedigree in Russian and Soviet thought, used to cast the maritime, capitalist powers (Britain, then the United States) as the natural civilisational rivals of a continental, collectivist Russia. The usage was revived and intensified under Putin, becoming a staple of the president, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and the heads of the security services.

Scholars of post-Soviet conspiracy culture, notably Ilya Yablokov, have shown how such tropes function as governance: a recognisable enemy with hidden intentions binds the public to the state and explains away every failure.1 The “Anglo-Saxon” label is attractive to propagandists precisely because it can carry the structure of older conspiracy theories — including antisemitic “hidden masters” narratives — in a form that sounds like respectable geopolitics.

The trope is used to:

  • personalise a diffuse “West” into a single malign agent with concealed intentions, making conspiracy thinking feel concrete and historical;
  • recycle conspiracist (and historically antisemitic) narrative structures in a geopolitically acceptable, deniable form;
  • explain any anti-Russian development as a long-planned “Anglo-Saxon” plot rather than a reaction to Russian actions;
  • drive wedges between allies, flattering continental Europe as a dupe or hostage of the “Anglo-Saxons” to separate it from the US and UK;
  • give a face to the Collective West, identifying who supposedly pulls its strings.

The claim collapses on contact with how democracies actually work. The US and UK are themselves internally divided, electorally accountable states whose Russia policies are publicly debated and frequently at odds with each other and with their allies. Attributing a unified centuries-long design to them is a conspiracy theory, not an analysis.

Nord Stream (September 2022). In his speech marking the claimed annexation of four Ukrainian regions, Putin asserted that “the Anglo-Saxons” had sabotaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines — an accusation offered without evidence and rejected by Western governments — a clear instance of the trope assigning a hidden Anglo-American hand to a major event.2

Peace-talks narrative (2022). Russian officials have repeatedly framed the collapse of early 2022 negotiations as the work of “Anglo-Saxons” overriding Ukraine’s wishes — a Kremlin claim that recasts Ukraine as a puppet with no agency of its own.

Routine attribution. On state television the label is applied reflexively to sanctions, weapons deliveries, and diplomatic setbacks, converting a wide range of separate decisions into evidence of one enduring plot.1

The “Anglo-Saxons” trope matters because it is a gateway to full conspiracy thinking. By naming a small, hidden, hereditary enemy behind world events, it lets propaganda explain everything and excuse anything: Russia is never an actor whose choices have consequences, only the target of an eternal plot. This both mobilises domestic support and denies the agency of Russia’s actual neighbours — above all Ukraine, which is reframed as a mere instrument of others.

The trope is also a vehicle for older hatreds. Its structure — a secret racial-cultural cabal controlling finance, media, and governments — maps directly onto classic antisemitic conspiracy theories, which is part of why it should be recognised and named rather than treated as ordinary geopolitical commentary.

  1. Yablokov, I. (2018). Fortress Russia: Conspiracy Theories in the Post-Soviet World. Polity — on conspiracy theory as a tool of governance and the recycling of “hidden masters” tropes. 2

  2. “Putin blames ‘Anglo-Saxons’ for Nord Stream explosions,” Meduza, 30 September 2022.